Overall Score 4.6  

The last of the synthetic results with 3D Mark Professional. Strong results for the little card, but in last place overall, hold your breath for a driver release to chip away at performance results like this. We need to test them with the release drivers, that’s all that’s really available, but newer releases should start to prove or disprove the claimed performances.

Sapphire Radeon R9 Nano 3DMark | amCharts


Gaming next, and Battlefield 4 up first. Battlefield 4 has a matured graphics engine and it is not really phased by any drivers or graphics cards, it should maximize your hardware and set up for lots of online killing!

bf4 2015-07-17 21-26-44-37

With all of our graphs, you can click to remove graphics cards. Re select to add the results back in.

Sapphire Radeon R9 Nano BF4 | amCharts


Next, Crysis 3 and we would say the little Nano is right in the mix with a strong second place.

Sapphire Radeon R9 Nano Crysis 3 | amCharts


There is no difference between the cards for performance and game play. A few spikes from the Fury X and Fury, but nothing you would really notice in the overall gaming experience. Again, with all of our graphs, you can click to remove graphics cards. Re select to add the results back in.

Package and Bundle
Performance
Price
Consumer Experience